Ministry of Law and Justice
Strength of Judges
Posted On:
24 MAR 2023 6:16PM by PIB Delhi
As on 21.03.2023, there is no vacancy of Judges in the Supreme Court. As far as the High Courts are concerned, against the sanctioned strength of 1114 Judges, 785 Judges are working and 329 posts of Judges are vacant. Against these 329 vacancies, 119 proposals
recommended by High Court Collegiums are at various stages of processing between the Government and the Supreme Court Collegium and recommendations against remaining 210 vacancies are yet to be received from the High Court Collegiums. TheHigh Court-wise detail of sanctioned strength, working strength and vacancy as on 21.03.2023 is at Annexure.
Appointment of Judges in higher judiciary is a collaborative and integrated process involving the executive and the judiciary. It requires consultation and approval from various constitutional authorities. Differences of opinion, if any, are mutually reconciled by the executive and the judiciary to ensure that only the apposite person is appointed to the high constitutional post of a Judge.
While every effort is made to fill up the existing vacancies expeditiously, vacancies of Judges in High Courts do keep on arising on account of retirement, resignation or elevation of Judges and also due to increase in the strength of Judges. Government is committed to filling up of vacancy expeditiously in time-bound manner.
During the period from May, 2014 to 2023 (till 21.03.2023), 54 Judges were appointed in Supreme Court of India, 893 fresh Judges were appointed in the various High Courts and 646 Additional Judges were appointed as Permanent Judges of High Courts.
The detailed statement of Pendency of Cases in Supreme Court and High Court for the past three years, showing the increase/decrease of pendency of cases in the respective courts is as below:
|
Year
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
|
Supreme Court*
|
64,429
|
96,855
|
69,598
|
|
High Courts**
|
56,42,567
|
56,49,068
|
59,78,714
|
*Source: Supreme Court of India pendency as on 4.12.2020, 6.12.2021 and 1.12.2022 respectively.
**Source: National Judicial Data Grid pendency as on 31st December of respective years i.e. 2020, 2021 and 2022.
The pendency of cases in courts is not only due to shortage of judges in High Courts but also due to various other factors like (i) increase in number of state and central legislations, (ii) accumulation of first appeals, (iii) continuation of ordinary civil jurisdiction in some of the High Courts, (iv) appeals against orders of quasi-judicial forums going to High Courts, (v) number of revisions/appeals, (vi) frequent adjournments, (vii) indiscriminate use of writ jurisdiction, (viii) lack of adequate arrangement to monitor, tracking and bunching of cases for hearing, (ix) assigning work of administrative nature to the Judges, etc.
This information was given by the Union Minister of Law & Justice, Shri Kiren Rijiju, in a written reply in Lok Sabha today.
*****
ANNEXURE
Statement showing Sanctioned strength, Working Strength and Vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts (As on 21.03.2023)
| |
|
Sanctioned strength
|
Working strength
|
Vacancies
|
|
A.
|
Supreme Court
|
34
|
34
|
0
|
|
B.
|
High Court
|
Pmt.
|
Addl
|
Total
|
Pmt.
|
Addl
|
Total
|
Pmt.
|
Addl
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Allahabad
|
119
|
41
|
160
|
82
|
21
|
103
|
37
|
20
|
57
|
|
2
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
28
|
9
|
37
|
26
|
5
|
31
|
2
|
4
|
6
|
|
3
|
Bombay
|
71
|
23
|
94
|
42
|
23
|
65
|
29
|
0
|
29
|
|
4
|
Calcutta
|
54
|
18
|
72
|
34
|
19
|
53
|
20
|
-1
|
19
|
|
5
|
Chhattisgarh
|
17
|
5
|
22
|
9
|
4
|
13
|
8
|
1
|
9
|
|
6
|
Delhi
|
46
|
14
|
60
|
45
|
0
|
45
|
1
|
14
|
15
|
|
7
|
Gauhati
|
22
|
8
|
30
|
14
|
9
|
23
|
8
|
-1
|
7
|
|
8
|
Gujarat
|
39
|
13
|
52
|
29
|
0
|
29
|
10
|
13
|
23
|
|
9
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
13
|
4
|
17
|
9
|
0
|
9
|
4
|
4
|
8
|
|
10
|
J & K and Ladakh
|
13
|
4
|
17
|
11
|
4
|
15
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
11
|
Jharkhand
|
20
|
5
|
25
|
20
|
1
|
21
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
|
12
|
Karnataka
|
47
|
15
|
62
|
40
|
13
|
53
|
7
|
2
|
9
|
|
13
|
Kerala
|
35
|
12
|
47
|
31
|
6
|
37
|
4
|
6
|
10
|
|
14
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
39
|
14
|
53
|
31
|
0
|
31
|
8
|
14
|
22
|
|
15
|
Madras
|
56
|
19
|
75
|
47
|
11
|
58
|
9
|
8
|
17
|
|
16
|
Manipur
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
17
|
Meghalaya
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
18
|
Orissa
|
24
|
9
|
33
|
21
|
0
|
21
|
3
|
9
|
12
|
|
19
|
Patna
|
40
|
13
|
53
|
32
|
0
|
32
|
8
|
13
|
21
|
|
20
|
Punjab & Haryana
|
64
|
21
|
85
|
38
|
27
|
65
|
26
|
-6
|
20
|
|
21
|
Rajasthan
|
38
|
12
|
50
|
33
|
0
|
33
|
5
|
12
|
17
|
|
22
|
Sikkim
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
23
|
Telangana
|
32
|
10
|
42
|
30
|
2
|
32
|
2
|
8
|
10
|
|
24
|
Tripura
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
|
25
|
Uttarakhand
|
9
|
2
|
11
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
|
|
Total
|
840
|
274
|
1114
|
640
|
145
|
785
|
200
|
129
|
329
|
******
SS/RKM
(Release ID: 1910433)
Visitor Counter : 18570