Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers :
Department of Fertilizers
azadi ka amrit mahotsav

PM-PRANAM Launched to Promote Sustainable Fertilizer Use and Restore Soil Health Across States


Over 5,800 Nano DAP and Nano Urea Field Trials Conducted Across 15 Agro-Climatic Zones Under DoF Initiative

Balanced NPK and Integrated Nutrient Management Improve Yields by Up to 50%: ICAR Long-Term Findings

Posted On: 27 MAR 2026 4:15PM by PIB Delhi

The Government continues to drive the "PM Programme for Restoration, Awareness Generation, Nourishment, and Amelioration of Mother-Earth" (PM-PRANAM), approved on June 28, 2023. The scheme provides a unique grant mechanism to incentivize States and Union Territories (UTs) that successfully reduce their consumption of chemical fertilizers compared to their previous three-year average.

All States/UTs are covered under the PM-PRANAM scheme. Under the PM-PRANAM scheme, there is a provision to provide incentives to States/UTs for reduction of consumption of chemical fertilizers (Urea, DAP, NPK, MOP) in a given financial year, compared to the average consumption over the previous three years, equivalent to 50% of the fertilizer subsidy saved. Of the total grant, 95% will be allocated to the State, while  provided to the States, 65% is for capital expenditure (capex) projects, preferably as contributions to Centrally Sponsored Schemes, and 30% is untied for other activities, including Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) initiatives.

Department of Fertilizers (DoF) in collaboration with fertiliser companies, has launched Maha Abhiyan to promote the adoption of Nano DAP across all 15 Agro-climatic zones of the country through consultations & field-level demonstrations. Under the guidance of Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) and the supervision of ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs), IFFCO had conducted 2,500 Nano DAP Farmer Field Trials during Kharif and Rabi 2024–25 and 2,938 Nano DAP Farmer Field Trials during Kharif and Rabi 2025-26 (till 23.03.2026) across 15 Agro-Climatic Zones (ACZs) of the country.

Additionally, DoF in collaboration with fertiliser companies, has initiated a nationwide campaign for field-level demonstrations and awareness programmes on Nano Urea Plus in 100 districts. IFFCO had conducted 448 Nano Urea Farmer Field Trials during Kharif and Rabi 2024–25 and 484 Nano Urea Farmer Field Trials during Kharif and Rabi 2025-26 (till 23.03.2026) across 15 Agro-Climatic Zones (ACZs) of the country under the guidance of Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) and the supervision of ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs).

The State wise, Agroclimatic Zone (ACZ) wise, Nano Fertilisers Field Trials, including Nano Urea and Nano DAP are placed at Annexure I (Kharif, 2024  (April to September-2024)), Annexure II (Rabi, 2024-25, (Oct-2024 to Mar-2025)), Annexure III (Kharif, 2025   (April to September-2025)) and Annexure IV (Rabi, 2025-26 (Oct-2025 to Mar-2026, as on 23.03.2026)).

Karnataka State Agriculture Universities have undertaken 2 long term experiments at University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore, which are as under:

  1. Long Term Fertilizer Experiments are under progress since 1986 at All India Coordinated Research Projects (AICRP) on Long-Term Fertilizer Experiments (LTFE), UAS, GKVK, Bangalore to study changes in soil quality, crop productivity and sustainability in Alfisols under finger millet-maize cropping system. The results of the experiments are attached at Annexure V.
  2. Long Term Fertilizer Experiments are under progress since 1978 at All India Coordinated Research Projects (AICRP) on Dry land Agriculture, UAS, GKVK, Bangalore to study the changes in soil quality, crop productivity and sustainability under finger millet mono-cropping and finger millet-groundnut crop rotation.

In addition to this, long-term studies conducted by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) at various locations across diverse agro-ecological regions of the country demonstrate the impact of balanced nutrient application on soil health and crop productivity. The findings indicate that recommended NPK application (100% NPK) improves crop yields by about 20–30 per cent over nitrogen-only use, while integrated nutrient management (100% NPK + farmyard manure) further enhances productivity by 30–50 per cent over control plots. Soil organic carbon is highest under integrated nutrient management, improving by about 0.1–0.3 percentage points over long-term nitrogen-only treatments, indicating better soil health. Microbial biomass carbon is also significantly higher, by 20–40 per cent, under integrated nutrient management compared to chemical fertilizers alone. In contrast, continuous nitrogen-only application leads to declining yields and deterioration of soil properties over time.

Further, under All India Coordinated Research Project on Soil Test Crop Response (AICRP-STCR), soil test-based balanced fertilizer prescription equations have been developed for major crops to enable site-specific nutrient management based on soil fertility and farmers’ resources. Coordinated programmes also promote balanced fertilization and integrated nutrient management through training, demonstrations, and awareness activities. Overall, balanced and integrated nutrient application is essential for sustaining soil fertility, improving crop productivity, and ensuring environmental sustainability.

The farmers can purchase their required amount of subsidized fertilizers based on the recommendation of Soil Health Card received by them through any fertilizers retail shop/ Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samridhi Kendra (PMKSK). The subject matter of Soil Health Card falls in the purview of Department of Agriculture & Farmer’s Welfare and no such proposal of integrate Soil Health Card recommendations with fertilizers supply plan has yet been received from the administrative Ministry.

Annexure-I

State wise, Agroclimatic Zone (ACZ) Wise, Nano Fertilisers Field Trials by IFFCO (in nos.)
during KHARIF, 2024  (April to September-2024)

S. No.

State

Nano Urea Plus

Nano DAP

Grand Total  

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

1

Andhra Pradesh

4

4

40

39

44

43

2

Andman & Nicobar

 

 

5

5

5

5

3

Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

1

1

1

1

4

Assam

4

4

55

55

59

59

5

Bihar

8

8

100

100

108

108

6

Chhattisgarh

6

6

20

20

26

26

7

Gujarat

12

12

80

80

92

92

8

Haryana

10

11

50

52

60

63

9

Himachal Pradesh

4

4

20

20

24

24

10

Jammu And Kashmir

0

4

20

19

20

23

11

Jharkhand

4

4

20

20

24

24

12

Karnataka

8

8

80

80

88

88

13

Kerala

2

2

20

16

22

18

14

Madhya Pradesh

10

10

80

80

90

90

15

Maharashtra

12

12

90

90

102

102

16

Manipur

 

 

2

2

2

2

17

Mizoram

 

 

8

8

8

8

18

Odisha

4

4

60

60

64

64

19

Punjab

14

14

50

50

64

64

20

Rajasthan

14

14

60

60

74

74

21

Tamil Nadu

14

14

85

86

99

100

22

Telangana

10

10

40

40

50

50

23

Tripura

 

 

4

4

4

4

24

Uttar Pradesh

44

44

150

150

194

194

25

Uttarakhand

6

6

59

59

65

65

26

West Bengal

10

10

70

70

80

80

27

G Total

200

205

1270

1266

1470

1471

Annexure-II

State wise, Agroclimatic Zone (ACZ) wise, Nano Fertilisers Field Trials by IFFCO (in nos.), 

during RABI, 2024-25, (Oct-2024 to Mar-2025)

S. No.

State

Nano Urea Plus

Nano DAP

Grand Total  

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

1

Andhra Pradesh

4

7

40

43

5

6

2

Andman & Nicobar

 

 

5

6

 

 

3

Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

1

1

1

1

4

Assam

4

20

55

55

59

75

5

Bihar

8

8

100

105

108

113

6

Chhattisgarh

6

7

20

19

26

26

7

Gujarat

12

12

80

80

92

92

8

Haryana

10

9

50

53

60

62

9

Himachal Pradesh

4

4

20

20

24

24

10

Jammu And Kashmir

 

4

20

20

20

24

11

Jharkhand

4

6

20

20

24

26

12

Karnataka

8

4

80

48

88

52

13

Kerala

2

2

20

15

22

17

14

Madhya Pradesh

10

10

80

80

90

90

15

Maharashtra

12

12

90

92

102

104

16

Manipur

 

 

2

2

2

2

17

Mizoram

 

 

8

8

8

8

18

Odisha

4

4

60

62

64

66

19

Punjab

14

14

50

50

64

64

20

Rajasthan

14

35

60

60

74

95

21

Tamil Nadu

14

14

85

84

99

98

22

Telangana

10

10

40

40

50

50

23

Tripura

 

 

4

3

4

3

24

Uttar Pradesh

44

46

150

150

194

196

25

Uttarakhand

6

5

59

48

65

53

26

West Bengal

10

10

70

70

80

80

27

G Total

200

243

1270

1234

1470

1477

 

Annexure-III

 

State wise, Agroclimatic Zone (ACZ) wise, Nano Fertilisers Field Trials by IFFCO (in Nos.)

during KHARIF, 2025   (April to September-2025)

S. No.

State

Nano Urea Plus

Nano DAP

Grand Total  

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

1

Andhra Pradesh

4

4

40

41

44

45

2

Andman & Nicobar

 

 

5

0

5

0

3

Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

1

1

1

1

4

Assam

4

4

55

57

59

61

5

Bihar

8

8

100

104

108

112

6

Chhattisgarh

6

7

20

22

26

29

7

Gujarat

12

12

80

80

92

92

8

Haryana

10

10

50

57

60

67

9

Himachal Pradesh

4

4

20

20

24

24

10

Jammu And Kashmir

0

5

20

20

20

25

11

Jharkhand

4

6

20

21

24

27

12

Karnataka

8

15

80

80

88

95

13

Kerala

2

1

20

12

22

13

14

Madhya Pradesh

10

10

80

76

90

86

15

Maharashtra

12

11

90

84

102

95

16

Manipur

 

 

2

2

2

2

17

Mizoram

0

1

8

8

8

9

18

Odisha

4

4

60

60

64

64

19

Punjab

14

14

50

50

64

64

20

Rajasthan

14

35

60

63

74

98

21

Tamil Nadu

14

17

85

71

99

88

22

Telangana

10

10

40

40

50

50

23

Tripura

 

 

4

4

4

4

24

Uttar Pradesh

44

52

150

134

194

186

25

Uttarakhand

6

5

59

35

65

40

26

West Bengal

10

10

70

70

80

80

27

G Total

200

245

1269

1212

1469

1457

Annexure-IV

State wise, Agroclimatic Zone (ACZ) wise Nano Fertilisers Field Trials by IFFCO (in Nos.),

  during RABI, 2025-26 (Oct-2025 to Mar-2026, as on 23.03.2026)

S. No.

State

Nano Urea Plus

Nano DAP

Grand Total  

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

Targeted

Trials Conducted

1

Andhra Pradesh

4

4

40

40

44

44

2

Andman & Nicobar

 

 

5

0

5

0

3

Arunachal Pradesh

 

 

1

1

1

1

4

Assam

4

4

55

55

59

59

5

Bihar

8

9

100

100

108

109

6

Chhattisgarh

6

3

20

19

26

22

7

Gujarat

12

12

80

80

92

92

8

Haryana

10

10

50

58

60

68

9

Himachal Pradesh

4

4

20

20

24

24

10

Jammu And Kashmir

0

5

20

20

20

25

11

Jharkhand

4

4

20

20

24

24

12

Karnataka

8

8

80

80

88

88

13

Kerala

2

2

20

20

22

22

14

Madhya Pradesh

10

10

80

83

90

93

15

Maharashtra

12

19

90

92

102

111

16

Manipur

 

 

2

2

2

2

17

Mizoram

 

 

8

8

8

8

18

Odisha

4

4

60

60

64

64

19

Punjab

14

15

50

50

64

65

20

Rajasthan

14

39

60

62

74

101

21

Tamil Nadu

14

15

85

85

99

100

22

Telangana

10

10

40

40

50

50

23

Tripura

 

 

4

4

4

4

24

Uttar Pradesh

44

47

150

153

194

200

25

Uttarakhand

6

5

59

50

65

55

26

West Bengal

10

10

70

70

80

80

27

G Total

200

239

1269

1272

1469

1511

 

Annexure-V

Results of Experiment

  1. Incorporation of FYM along with optimal dose of NPK, improved soil physical properties (Soil aggregates, bulk density, total porosity and hydraulic conductivity).
  2. The practice of applying only fertilizers has resulted in considerable drop down in soil pH, especially with higher levels of NPK and N alone.
  3. Application of FYM as soil amendment is more effective than lime as former has not only moderating effect but also supplies nutrients like N, P, K and other micronutrients.
  4. Buildup of available phosphorus is recorded in plots treated with 100% and 150% dose of P while, marginal buildup of K is recorded in plots that received 100% potassium.
  5. Reduced level of phosphorus application (50% P) would be beneficial in terms of saving fertilizers as well as sustaining the crop productivity in P buildup soils.
  6. Available S content in soil markedly increased when SSP fertilizer was given as P source but decreased when treated with DAP. Sulphur deficiency was observed due to continuous application DAP fertilizer as P source.
  7. There was a marginal decline of Ca content in soil in all treatments except those treated with lime and FYM.
  8. Deficiency of micronutrients is not found as the balanced application of nutrients using organic manure is taking care of micronutrients by mobilization from the reserve source of residual bio-mass added to soil.
  9. Balanced and integrated use of nutrients improved soil organic carbon status, the beneficial microbiological population and enzyme activities in soil.
  10. The minimum amount (threshold) of carbon required to maintain initial carbon level in soil is dependent on initial content of carbon in soil and climate and it was found to be 3600 kg/ ha/year.
  11. Integrated use of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures not only sustained the soil productivity on long term basis but also improved the nutrient use efficiency.
  12. The sustainable yield index (SYI) of maize and finger millet over the years is found highest in the plots which received NPK+FYM+lime and 150% NPK, respectively.
  13. Higher Soil Quality Index is recorded in T10 (NPK+FYM+ lime) followed by T8 (NPK+FYM) treatments and lower SQI is recorded in control and imbalanced treatments.
  14. Soil pH, K, Ca, Mg and microbial biomass carbon are important soil indicators to be taken care of for improving soil quality. Practical Significance: Applying the optimal dose of fertilizers integrated with organic sources such as FYM is essential for sustaining crop productivity and improving long-term soil health. Indiscriminate or imbalanced use of nitrogenous fertilizers drastically reduces yield and leads to significant deterioration of soil health. Farmers should be discouraged from applying only nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (such as DAP and urea) for finger millet. The inclusion of potassium, along with recommended doses of nitrogen and phosphorus, is crucial for achieving sustained higher yields. The commonly used high-analysis fertilizer DAP should be supplemented with secondary nutrients, as continuous reliance on DAP alone has contributed to widespread secondary nutrient deficiencies. Continuous application of the recommended dose of phosphorus has been observed to cause soil phosphorus buildup. In such situations, applying half the recommended phosphorus dose is sufficient to meet the crop's needs without compromising yield.

(Source: UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru)

Practical Significance:

  • Applying the optimal dose of fertilizers integrated with organic sources such as FYM is essential for sustaining crop productivity and improving long-term soil health.
  • Indiscriminate or imbalanced use of nitrogenous fertilizers drastically reduces yield and leads to significant deterioration of soil health.
  • Farmers should be discouraged from applying only nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (such as DAP and urea) for finger millet. The inclusion of potassium, along with recommended doses of nitrogen and phosphorus, is crucial for achieving sustained higher yields.
  • The commonly used high-analysis fertilizer DAP should be supplemented with secondary nutrients, as continuous reliance on DAP alone has contributed to widespread secondary nutrient deficiencies.

Continuous application of the recommended dose of phosphorus has been observed to cause soil phosphorus buildup. In such situations, applying half the recommended phosphorus dose is sufficient to meet the crop's needs without compromising yield.

This information was given by the Minister for Chemicals and Fertilizers, Shri Jagat Prakash Nadda, in a written reply in the Lok Sabha today.

 ******

Neeraj Kumar Bhatt/ Amit Kumar/ Shatrughna Prasad

cmc.fertilizers[at]gmail[dot]com


(Release ID: 2246007) Visitor Counter : 599
Read this release in: हिन्दी