Development of backward regions has been a
major concern of the Government. Initial approaches to address this issue
consisted of assistance for development to backward States and special area
programmes. In the Tenth Plan, it was
decided to have a new approach to target these areas through a specific
programme for backward areas and the Rashtriya Sam Vikas Yojana (RSVY) was
introduced in 2003-04 which was subsumed into the Backward Regions Grant Fund
(BRGF) programme in 2006-07. The BRGF
programme was launched by the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh at Barpeta
(Assam) on 19.2.2007. It covers 250
districts in 27 States as against 147 districts (27 States) covered by the
RSVY.
The
BRGF Programme aims to catalyse development in backward areas by providing
infrastructure, promoting good governance and agrarian reforms, converging, through
supplementary infrastructure and capacity building, the substantial existing
development inflows into these districts. The Fund accordingly provides
financial resources for supplementing and converging existing development
inflows into identified districts, to Bridge critical gaps in local
infrastructure and other development requirements that are not being adequately
met through existing inflows; To strengthen Panchayat and Municipality level
governance with more appropriate capacity building to facilitate participatory
planning, decision making, implementation and monitoring and to reflect local
felt needs; Provide professional support to local bodies for planning,
implementation and monitoring their plans; Improve the performance and delivery
of critical functions assigned to Panchyats and counter possible efficiency and
equity losses on account of inadequate local capacity.
Funding Pattern
The
BRGF consists of two funding windows a Capability Building Fund of Rs. 250
crore per annum calculated @t Rs. 1 crore per district per year to build
capacity in planning, implementation, monitoring, accounting and improving
accountability and transparency. Second a substantially untied grant for the
balance amount of the annual allocation which is distributed among the
districts concerned where every district receives a fixed minimum amount of Rs.
10 crore per annum and 50% of the balance allocation under the Scheme is
allocated on the basis of the share of the population of the district in the
total population of all backward districts.
All
funds sanctioned by the Ministry under the Programme are transferred to the
Consolidated Funds of the State Government concerned. These funds are required to be transferred to
the Panchayats, the Municipalities and other implementing authorities by the State Governments.
In
the years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10, the Budget allocations under BRGF were
Rs. 4670 crore per year.
The planning process under BRGF is
based on the guidelines for district planning issued by the Planning Commission
in August 2006 and January, 2009. The process of integrated development will
commence with each district undertaking a diagnostic study of its backwardness
and a baseline survey by enlisting
professional planning support, to be followed by a well-conceived participatory
district development perspective plan to address this backwardness during the
period of the Eleventh Five Year Plan.
Such plans will integrate multiple programmes that are in operation in
the district concerned and therefore address backwardness through a combination
of resources that flow to the district.
This will be done without giving any schematic overlay to BRGF that
would be subversive of the principle of local prioritization in planning.
Physical Targets and Achievements
Since
the district plans are consolidation of plans prepared by each of the planning
units, they would vary from Panchayat to Panchayat and District Plan to
District Plan, based on locally identified needs. Analysis of the District Plans received in the Ministry so far
from the various States indicates that the untied fund allocated to the
districts are generally being used for filling infrastructure gaps in drinking
water, health, education, social sectors, electrification etc. The basket of works taken up includes
construction of school building/class rooms, toilets, playgrounds, health
sub-centre, Ayurveda Centre, bore wells, drinking water facility, sanitation
facilities, anganwadi buildings, Panchayat buildings, irrigation tanks/channels,
agriculture and animal husbandry facilities, electrification, street lights,
link roads, market yards, Haat Bazaars, flood control structures, soil and
water conservation measures, cremation/burial grounds, houses for BPL families,
training and marketing facilities for SHGs, culverts, suspension bridges etc.
Typical
allocation of resources across a sample State reveals :-
|
Sl. No.
|
Sector
|
%age spending
|
|
1.
|
Angawadi Buildings
|
25.0
|
|
2.
|
Schools, Class Rooms compounds
etc.
|
16.3
|
|
3.
|
Drinking water
|
13.6
|
|
4.
|
Gram Panchayat Buildings
|
9.6
|
|
5.
|
Electrification
|
4.4
|
|
6.
|
Health
|
2.0
|
|
7.
|
Hostel Buildings
|
1.9
|
|
8.
|
Animal Husbandry
|
1.5
|
|
9.
|
Others
|
25.6
|
|
|
Total
|
100.0
|
Financial Achievements (As on
14.09.2009)
(Amount in Rs. Crore)
|
Sl. No.
|
Financial Year
|
Allocation
|
Expenditure Achievement
|
|
BE
|
RE
|
|
1.
|
2006-2007
|
3750.00
|
1925.00
|
1925.00
|
|
2.
|
2007-2008
|
4670.00
|
3600.00
|
3600.00
|
|
3.
|
2008-2009
|
4670.00
|
3890.00
|
3889.75
|
|
4.
|
2009-2010
|
4670.00
|
-
|
464.11*
|
The details of BRGF sanctions as on 14.09.2009 is given
below: -
|
ABSTRACT OF RELEASES IN
2009-10 UNDER BRGF
|
|
As on 14.09.2009
|
|
|
COMPONENT
|
Amount (Rs in Crore)
|
|
A
|
RSVY
|
52.50
|
|
B
|
Capacity Building
|
15.57
|
|
C
|
Development grant
|
396.04
|
|
|
Total
|
464.11
|
Major Achievements
The
Programme has pioneered the tradition of working through the constitutionally
empowered planning mechanism of the Panchayats, Municipalities and the District
Planning Committees. The Programme has made the decentralised planning process more
meaningful, even though the quantum of untied funds is meager. Focus on
capacity building of local bodies has enhanced the functionality, confidence
and awareness of their elected representatives and officials. The Programme has contributed to the improvements
in local governance performance and functioning of the local bodies and their
empowerment. Despite staff constraints, the PRIs & the ULBs have been able
to utilise the grants speedily and have created useful assets for the local
community. The Programme has stimulated grassroots participation in
Gram/Ward/Area Sabhas and bottom-up planning. The discretionary nature
of the BRGF development funds to PRIs and small ULBs has been appreciated by
the Local Bodies as the most significant feature of the Programme. BRGF
stimulated capacity building activities targeted at PRI officials and
functionaries.
* Deputy Director (M
& C), PIB, New Delhi.
RTS/VN
SS-108/SF-108/29.09.2009