For
Reference and Record
The
Minister of State for Environment and Forests clarified the issues regarding Scheduled
Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act in tiger reserves and in the critical wildlife habitats. The
Minister states that:
1.
“Section 38V of the Wildlife
(Protection) Act, 1972 (as amended in 2006) explains the core or critical tiger
habitat as well as the buffer or peripheral area of a tiger reserve.
2.
A tiger reserve includes two parts:
A.
Core or critical tiger habitat (National
Park or Sanctuary status).
B.
Buffer or peripheral area.
3.
The phrase ‘core or critical tiger habitat’ is mentioned only in the Wildlife
(Protection) Act, 1972, as a sequel to amendment made to the said Act in
2006. It is NOT defined in the Scheduled
Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights)
Act, 2006.
4.
The phrase ‘critical wildlife habitat’ is defined only in the Scheduled Tribes
and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006,
and NOT in the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.
5.
‘Core or critical tiger habitat’ is
different from the ‘critical wildlife habitat’.
Since tigers are territorial big cats, hence considering their social
land tenure dynamics, the ‘core / critical tiger habitat’ has been viewed
separately from the ‘critical wildlife habitat’, which is applicable to other
wild animal species.
6.
Based on deliberations with experts and
simulation results from scientific data, it has been found that a minimum
inviolate area of 800-1200 sq.km. is required to
sustain a viable population of tigers (20 breeding females).
7.
Establishing the core / critical tiger
habitat as ‘inviolate’ involves two steps as per the Wildlife (Protection) Act,
1972:
A. Identifying
the core / critical tiger habitat by establishing on the basis of scientific
and objective area that such areas are required to be kept as inviolate for the
purpose of tiger conservation, without affecting the rights of the Scheduled
Tribes or such other forest dwellers, and notified as such by the State
Government in consultation with an expert committee constituted for the purpose
(out of 17 tiger States, 16 have notified the core / critical tiger habitat
following this process, and action is pending only from Bihar).
B.
Establishing the identified core /
critical tiger habitat as inviolate through voluntary relocation on mutually
agreed terms and conditions, provided that such terms and conditions satisfy
the requirements laid down in the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. No Scheduled Tribes or other forest dwellers
shall be resettled or have their rights adversely affected for creating inviolate
areas for tiger unless:
(i)
The process of recognition /
determination of rights and acquisition of land or forest rights of the ST and
such other forest dwelling persons is complete.
(ii)
The concerned agencies of the State
Government need to establish with the consent of the ST and such other forest
dwellers in the area, besides also consulting an ecological and social
scientist familiar with the area, that the activities of the ST and other
forest dwellers or the impact of their presence upon wild animals is sufficient
to cause irreversible damage and shall threaten the existence of tigers and
their habitat.
(iii)
The State Government has to obtain the
consent of the ST and other forest dwellers and come to a conclusion (besides
consulting an independent ecological / social scientist) that no coexistence
options are available.
(iv)
Resettlement package needs to be
prepared providing for livelihood of affected individuals, while fulfilling the
requirements of the National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy.
(v)
The informed consent of Gram Sabhas and affected persons has to be obtained for
resettlement.
(vi)
The facilities and land allocation at
resettlement area are to be provided, otherwise the
existing rights of people shall not be interfered with.
8.
The above provisions laid down in the
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (section 38V), subsequent to the 2006 amendment
are specific to tiger conservation, and are not only compatible but more
stringent than the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition
of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.
9.
Under the revised Centrally Sponsored
Scheme of Project Tiger (2008), two options have been given to people:
Option-I: Payment of Rs. 10 lakhs per family in case the family opts so, without any
rehabilitation / relocation process by the Forest Department.
Option-II:
Carrying out relocation /
rehabilitation by the Forest Department with the following per family norms out
of Rs. 10 lakhs:
(a)
|
Agricultural
land procurement (2 ha.) and development
|
35%
of the total package
|
(b)
|
Settlement
of rights
|
30%
of the total package
|
(c)
|
Homestead
land and house construction
|
20%
of the total package
|
(d)
|
Incentive
|
5%
of the total package
|
(e)
|
Community
facilities (access road, irrigation, drinking water,
sanitation, electricity, telecommunication,
community centre,
places
of worship, cremation ground)
|
10%
of the total package
|
The
cash option has been provided for catering to people who are not interested in
a resettlement and are prepared to establish themselves elsewhere under
‘mutually agreed terms and conditions’, as indicated in the Wildlife
(Protection) Act, 1972.
1.
This has checks and balances as the
money is provided through the District Collector after the villager produces
evidence of his procuring land etc.
2.
The relocation is voluntary, and is done
only if people are willing to move.
3.
Monitoring committees at the District as
well as State levels are required to be constituted and detailed guidelines
have been issued for handholding the people after relocation, besides ensuring
the centrality of PI institutions, while involving independent agencies.
4.
Advisories have been issued to States
for complying with the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 read with the Scheduled
Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights)
Act, 2006.
Critical
Wildlife Habitats
- FRA
had come into force in January 2007 and the MoE&F
had issued guidelines to the State/UT Governments for notification of the
Critical Wildlife Habitats (CWLHs) in October 2007. During the last three
years, not much headway could be made in notification of CWLHs. The
State/UT Governments have been expressing difficulties in notifying CWLHs
on the basis of the 2007 guidelines. Accordingly, MoE&F
convened meetings with the Chief Wildlife Wardens and officers of the
Wildlife Institute of India, discussed the guidelines and has now issued
the revised guidelines, which are in consonance with the FRA.
- CWLHs
are such areas of the National Parks and Sanctuaries that are required to
be kept as ‘inviolate’ for the purpose of wildlife conservation as
determined and notified by the MoE&F, after
an open process of consultation by an Expert Committee. Such areas are to
be clearly identified on case-to-case basis following scientific and
objective criteria and only after
settling the rights of tribals and other
traditional forest dwellers.
- The
identification and declaration of CWLHs are two distinct processes. While
the identification of an area required for betterment of wildlife
conservation is purely a scientific exercise to be carried out by the
Forest Departments on a case-to-case basis in consultation with the
scientific institutions (the criteria for identification of CWLHs have to
be site-specific), its notification is to be done only after extensive
consultations (means consent)
with the Gram Sabha and the affected persons/stakeholders .
- The
guidelines ensure that CWLHs are declared only with the voluntary consent
of the affected people. It also gives ample scope to the State/UT
Governments to explore the possibility of ‘co-existence’. If such a
possibility is not practicable, the Expert Committee, which also includes
the District Tribal Welfare Officer and an NGO working in the field of
Tribal Welfare, will have consultations with the Gram Sabha
/affected persons for their relocation, during which the available options
(Option –I for payment of rupees ten lakhs per
family and Option-II for
comprehensive rehabilitation by providing land, house with facilities,
community rights, by the Forest Department) for voluntary relocation would
also be explained. The relocation involves providing secure livelihoods to
the persons to be relocated. In fact they may choose the option most
suited to them.
- The
guidelines for notification of CWLHs apply only to the National Parks and
Sanctuaries and not to other forest areas.
The
Ministry of Environment and Forests will take all steps to ensure that the
letter and spirit of FRA, 2006 is respected and followed in all wildlife
conservation programmes. If there is any violation anywhere and that violation
is reported with full documentation and evidence, it will be prepared to
intervene to ensure that the situation is rectified forthwith”.
KP