|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.
|
A. CRUDE OIL
PRODUCTION – PERFORMANCE
|
|
Month /
Period
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis target
(%age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last
year (%age)
|
|
|
|
October, 2010*
|
3.327
|
3.245
|
97.5
|
-2.5
|
13.7
|
|
April-October,
2010*
|
21.697
|
21.542
|
99.3
|
-0.7
|
10.7
|
|
April- October,
2009
|
|
19.457
|
|
|
|
|
MMT: Million
Metric Tonnes.
|
|
|
*: Provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
COMPANY-WISE ACHIEVEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
Company /
State
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) (%age)
|
|
ONGC
|
2.1950
|
2.0830
|
94.9
|
-5.1
|
|
Gujarat
|
0.5010
|
0.4830
|
96.4
|
|
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
0.0240
|
0.0250
|
104.2
|
|
|
Tamil Nadu
|
0.0200
|
0.0200
|
100.0
|
|
|
Assam
|
0.1160
|
0.1040
|
89.7
|
|
|
Mumbai Region (incl
Mumbai High)
|
1.5340
|
1.4510
|
94.6
|
|
|
OIL
|
0.3153
|
0.3119
|
98.9
|
-1.1
|
|
Assam
|
0.3134
|
0.3101
|
98.9
|
|
|
Arunachal Pradesh
|
0.0019
|
0.0018
|
94.7
|
|
|
PRIVATE/JVC
|
0.8169
|
0.8499
|
104.0
|
4.0
|
|
TOTAL
|
3.3272
|
3.2448
|
97.5
|
-2.5
|
|
|
|
C. REASONS
FOR SHORTFALL
|
|
Company /
State
|
Reasons for shortfall
|
|
ONGC (Gujarat)
|
· Ceasure
of self flow wells. Power shutdown.
Increasing water cut trend. Less than expected oil gain from new
wells. Planned shutdown for repair of 600 mtrs. Gas lift line from Hazira to Motwan.
|
|
ONGC (Assam)
|
· Environmental Problems.
|
|
ONGC (Tamil Nadu)
|
· Wells to be closed on account of less gas offtake
by consumers M/s. TNEB. Frequent load
shedding.
|
|
ONGC (Mumbai High Offshore)
|
· Development of earmarked rig
deferred to post monsoon . Less than anticipated production from wells
of Vasak East field. Offtake
affected due to mooring & Demooring at D1
field.
|
|
OIL (Assam)
|
Marginal loss
in crude oil production was due to environmental problems such as Oil
blockade, disruption in bowser movement etc.
|
|
A statement
showing Crude Oil Production during October, 2010 and cumulatively for the
period April- October, 2010 vis-à-vis planned production is at Annexure-I.
|
|
Cont’d…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. A. REFINERY PRODUCTION
|
|
(IN TERMS OF CRUDE THROUGHPUT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month /
Period
|
Planned Target (MMT)
|
Actual Production (MMT)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis
target (in %age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last
year (in %age)
|
|
October, 2010*
|
13.49
|
13.58
|
100.6
|
0.6
|
-4.8
|
|
April- October,
2010*
|
91.20
|
93.58
|
102.6
|
2.6
|
1.4
|
|
April- October,
2009
|
|
92.25
|
|
|
|
|
*: Provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The crude
throughput in IOC (Guwahati, Barauni,
Haldia, Bongaigaon, Koyali, Digboi & Mathura), BPCL (Mumbai & Kochi), CPCL (Manali & Narimanam), NRL (Numaligarh), MRPL (Mangalore), ONGC (Tatipaka),& EOL, (Vadinar) refineries
have exceeded their planned target.
|
|
The crude
throughput in IOC ( Panipat
), HPCL (Mumbai & Visakh) & RPL( Jamnagar)
refineries was less than their planned target.
|
|
|
|
B. REASONS
FOR SHORTFALL :
|
|
|
|
Company /
State
|
Reasons for shortfall
|
|
IOCL, Panipat
|
· Throughput is less because of planned
revamp shutdown of major units in Sep-Oct 2010, which got shifted from
July-Aug 2010.
|
|
HPCL, Mumbai
|
· Because of thruput reduction due to extended
s/d of SEUs/PDA and LSHS ullage
constraints. Cummulative
crude thruput during the period (April-October' 10)
was lower than prorata MOU Excellent Target mainly
because of extended planned shutdown of CDU-II (FRE) unit.
|
|
HPCL, Visakh
|
· Cummulative crude thruput for the period (April-October' 10) was lower than
MOU Target because of extension of CDU-II planned shutdown and unplanned
CDU-III shutdown for vaccum heater tube problems.
|
|
|
|
A statement showing
refinery-wise production during the month of October, 2010 and cumulatively
for the period April- October, 2010 vis-à-vis planned target is at
Annexure-II.
|
|
|
|
|
III. REFINERY CAPACITY UTILISATION [excluding
RPL(SEZ)]
|
|
|
|
Month
|
Utilisation (%)
|
Period
|
Utilisation (%)
|
|
October, 2010
|
102.9
|
April- October, 2010
|
102.7
|
|
October, 2009
|
112.7
|
April- October, 2009
|
101.3
|
|
|
|
The
refinery-wise details of the capacity utilisation during October, 2010 and
cumulatively for the period April- October, 2010 vis-a-vis
2009 are given in Annexure-III.
|
|
Cont’d…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV.
A. NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
|
|
|
|
Month / Period
|
Planned Target (MCM)
|
Actual Production (MCM)
|
%age achieve-ment
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) Vis-à-vis
target (%age)
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) over last
year (%age)
|
|
October, 2010*
|
4543.4
|
4348.1
|
95.7
|
-4.3
|
6.5
|
|
April- October,
2010*
|
31339.0
|
31011.8
|
99.0
|
-1.0
|
22.1
|
|
April- October,
2009
|
|
25406.5
|
|
|
|
|
MCM: Million
Cubic Metres.
|
|
*: Provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. COMPANY-WISE ACHIEVEMENT
|
|
|
|
Company /
State
|
Planned Target (MCM)
|
Actual Production (MCM)
|
%age achievement
|
Surplus(+) Shortfall(-) (%age)
|
|
ONGC
|
1972.2
|
1954.5
|
99.1
|
-0.9
|
|
Gujarat
|
154.3
|
164.4
|
106.6
|
|
|
Rajasthan
|
1.3
|
0.8
|
59.8
|
|
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
116.9
|
119.8
|
102.5
|
|
|
Tamil Nadu
|
113.0
|
100.4
|
88.9
|
|
|
Assam
|
40.5
|
39.1
|
96.5
|
|
|
Tripura
|
49.6
|
53.7
|
108.3
|
|
|
Mumbai High Offshore
|
1496.7
|
1476.3
|
98.6
|
|
|
OIL
|
231.9
|
205.8
|
88.7
|
-11.3
|
|
Assam
|
201.9
|
191.5
|
94.8
|
|
|
Arunachal Pradesh
|
1.9
|
1.6
|
83.3
|
|
|
Rajasthan
|
28.1
|
12.7
|
45.2
|
|
|
PRIVATE/JVC
|
2339.2
|
2187.9
|
93.5
|
-6.5
|
|
Onshore $
|
42.9
|
63.8
|
148.7
|
|
|
Offshore
|
2296.3
|
2124.1
|
92.5
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
4543.4
|
4348.1
|
95.7
|
-4.3
|
|
$: Including
Coal Bed Methane production.
|
|
|
|
C. REASONS FOR SHORTFALL
|
|
Company /
State
|
Reasons for
shortfall
|
|
ONGC
(Rajasthan)
|
· Less off take by M/s
RRVUNL.
|
|
ONGC (Tamil Nadu)
|
· Less off-take by consumers M/s.
TNEB.
|
|
ONGC (MumbaiHigh)
|
· Closure of free gas wells due to
less offtake by M/s Gail. Closure of free gas wells of Bandra formation to optimise condensate receipt at Uran.
|
|
OIL(Assam)
|
· Gas supply to NRL not yet resumed as per
plan. Less gas withdrawal by
BVFCL.
|
|
OIL (Arunachal Pradesh)
|
· Natural Gas production in Arunachal Pradesh (AP) was regulated due to lack of
customers in AP.
|
|
OIL (Rajasthan)
|
· Both the GT units of RRVUNL in
Rajasthan were shut-down from August, 2010.
Only 1 no. unit operated throughout October, 2010.
|
|
A statement
showing natural gas production during October, 2010 and cumulatively for the
period April- October, 2010 vis-à-vis 2009 is at Annexure-IV.
|
|
|
AKT
|
|