A Health Survey conducted by the
National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) has indicated that during
a 15 day reference period 89 per 1000 persons reported illness in rural India
against 118 persons-Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP) in urban
areas. However,
un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban
areas. Private
Doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors
(Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per
cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector. Inclination
towards allopathic treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors).
The
National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation has released the key indicators of Social Consumption in India:
Health, generated from the data collected during the period January to June 2014
in its 71st round survey.
NSS
Surveys on morbidity are being conducted from 28th round (1973-1974)
and the last survey was conducted in NSS 60th round (January to June
2004).
The survey on Social Consumption: Health conducted during the period January to
June 2014 aimed at generating basic quantitative information on the health
sector. One of the vital components of the survey was dedicated to collect
information relevant for determination of the prevalence rate of different
diseases among various age-sex groups in different regions of the country.
Further, measurement of the extent of use of health services provided by the
Government was an important part of this exercise. Special attention was given
to hospitalisation i.e. medical care received as in-patient of medical
institutions. The ailments for which such medical care was sought, the extent
of use of Government hospitals as well as different levels of public health
care institutions, and the expenditure incurred on treatment received from
public and private sectors, were investigated by the survey. Break-up of
expenditure by various heads was estimated for expenses on medical care
received both as in-patient and otherwise.
The detailed results of this
survey on health are planned to be brought out by the NSSO through a main
report. In order to make available the salient results of the survey well in
advance of the release of its report for use in planning, policy formulation, and
decision support and as input for further statistical exercises, the NSSO has
released the key indicators.
The
key indicators are based on the Central sample consisting of 4,577 villages in
rural areas and 3,720 urban blocks spread over all States and Union Territories
of India. The information was collected through a schedule (25.0) from a set of
sample households during the period January to June 2014. The total number of
households in which Schedule was canvassed, was 36480 in rural India and 29452
in urban India.
A.
non-hospitalised treatment:
o
Table
below gives
the survey estimates on Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP) measured
as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons) during
15-day reference period for different gender and age groups in rural and urban
sectors. The PAP (per 1000 persons) was 89 persons in rural India and 118
persons in urban India. It may be mentioned that these estimates are based on
self-reported morbidity data, rather than on medical examination. As
expected, the PAPs were found to be high for children and much higher for the
higher age groups and low for the younger age groups.
Table:
Proportion (per 1000) of ailing persons (PAP) during last 15 days for
different age groups separately for gender: rural, urban
|
age-group
|
rural
|
urban
|
male
|
female
|
persons
|
male
|
female
|
persons
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
(6)
|
(7)
|
0-4
|
119
|
86
|
103
|
111
|
117
|
114
|
5-9
|
65
|
50
|
58
|
87
|
71
|
80
|
10-14
|
43
|
47
|
45
|
57
|
53
|
56
|
15-29
|
35
|
57
|
46
|
38
|
59
|
48
|
30-44
|
60
|
94
|
77
|
71
|
126
|
98
|
45-59
|
109
|
163
|
135
|
173
|
239
|
206
|
60-69
|
247
|
270
|
259
|
331
|
379
|
355
|
70+
|
327
|
286
|
306
|
376
|
371
|
373
|
all
|
80
|
99
|
89
|
101
|
135
|
118
|
o
Inclination
towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors).
Only 5 to 7 percent usage of ‘other’ including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga
or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural
and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both
for male and female) than urban areas.
o
Private
doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors
(Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per
cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector
(consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable
institutions, etc.).
B.
hospitalised treatment:
o
Medical
treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution
having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as
hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4% persons were hospitalised
at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons
hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5%).
o
It
is observed that in rural India, 42% hospitalised treatment was carried out in
public hospital and rest 58% in private hospital. For the urban India, the
corresponding figures were 32% and 68%. It may be noted in
this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in
sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of
treatment.
o
Preference
towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as
well.
C. Cost of treatment – as in-patient and
other:
o
Average
medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for
treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (₹ 25850)
than in the public hospitals (₹ 6120). The highest
expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (₹ 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases
(₹ 31647).
o
Average
medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was ₹ 509 in rural India
and ₹
639
in urban India.
o
As
much as 86% of rural population and 82% of urban population were still not
covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however,
was able to bring about 12% urban and 13% rural population under health
protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar
plan. Only 12% households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer
Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from
private provider.
D.
Incidence of Childbirth, Expenditure on Institutional Childbirth:
o
In
rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the
reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of
interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in
rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were
at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas
was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public
hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the
corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.
o An
average of ₹ 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area
and ₹ 11685 in urban area. The rural
population spent, on an average, ₹ 1587 for
the same in a public sector hospital and ₹ 14778 for
one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were
₹ 2117
and ₹ 20328.
A publication based on the
above-cited Key-Indicators is also available on the website (www.mospi.gov.in) of the Ministry of
Statistics & Programme Implementation.
******************
KSP/SS